Critics of Sound Transit’s recent poll call it a “push-poll”, meaning that it is written to drive you to a particular outcome, favored by Sound Transit.
Ostensibly, these results would be used to calculate the public will for another Sound Transit proposal on the ballot in fall 2008.
See the debate over Sound Transit’s methods at: http://www.crosscut.com/tacoma/12134/
From sjenner:
“I think an appropriate survey would ask people to give their priorities, it would provide a way for open ended comments that could then be used to shape a follow up survey that is both open to the public and that is asked in a statistically valid manner of voters who live in the taxing area. Finally it would not be prejudged to an end point: the whole point of the survey seems to be “will people vote for .3, .5 or what for a sales tax increase to pay for rail.” Definitely the survey should ask about alternatives for paying for transportation improvements. The legislature should insist on this before there’s another vote.”
From dbreneman:
“Yeah, push polling is an understatement. It was more like shove down a flight of stairs polling.”
From sjenner:
“I personally feel it is appropriate to call a survey a “push poll” if it asks questions that directs answers into certain groupings that appear to me to be pre-defined…..
We’ve learned that the poll is open to anyone, not just voters in the taxing district. We’ve learned it is possible to take the poll multiple times. We’ve learned certain questions are not included, like “what is the region’s top transportation priority” or “how important is reducing greenhouse gas as a part of a transportation plan” or “what suggestions do you have for paying for public transit besides a sales tax increase.”
From rasul:
“I did take the poll and found the questions to be very loaded. There were comment spaces, but I wonder what will be done with the comments–largely tossed, I’m guessing.”