Seattle Weekly’s “20 things about Seattle we wish were a joke”- Trolleys vs. Bus Capacity

April 2nd, 2009

On the subject of balancing budgets & what is affordable in this economy, read #4 from Seattle Weekly (click here):

We’re getting more public transit we don’t use and less of the transit we do“.

They’re bright orange, they’re empty, and they seem to putter back and forth endlessly without reason: That’s the South Lake Union Streetcar. Then there’s the Metro buses: Yellow and aquamarine, they’re packed to the gills every rush hour with overburdened commuters. Which transit system would you rather see get more money? Sorry. Mayor Greg Nickels’ toy gift to Paul Allen is the one slated for expansion, as the Seattle City Council voted to explore extending the line to Pioneer Square and the U District. An extension to First Hill was slipped into the Sound Transit package approved by voters last November. Meanwhile, King County Executive Ron Sims announced in February that bus service may need to be cut by 20 percent due to a projected $100 million funding shortfall in 2010. Granted, the trolleys and buses are funded from different sources, but come on—$40 million per mile to lay down new putt-putt tracks when we could increase our bus trolleys for a fraction of that?

Sounds like it’s time to seriously rethink our whole scheme for getting from point A to point B.”

City of Bellevue to Hear Citizens re: Sound Transit’s Light Rail Corridor Alignments & Accompanying Impacts

February 2nd, 2009

Hypothetically Optimal Transportation

October 22nd, 2008
“What is the optimal relationship between land use and transit,” asks Patrick Condon, “and what transit mode would best support this optimum state?” He concludes that cities should invest more in “trams” (streetcars) rather than in long-distance, higher-speed rail systems. Flickr photo by NeiTech. Condon is a professor of landscape architecture at the University of British Columbia, [...]

Ted Van Dyk’s Crosscut Article: “Ballot Measures Can Subvert Good Government” & Sound Transit’s “Light Rail Kool-Aid”

October 21st, 2008

Ballot measures: Hate 'em, but here's how I'm voting - Crosscut

October 21st, 2008
Ballot measures: Hate 'em, but here's how I'm voting Crosscut, WA - 7 hours ago Sound Transit, light rail's prime- and sub-contractors, and the network of law firms, PR firms, consultants, and others profiting from light rail have ...

How to Ensure Sound Transit’s Light Rail Ridership #’s- Cut Popular Bus Routes?

October 16th, 2008

41st District Candidates Weigh in on Sound Transit’s Proposition 1 (ST2) Tax Proposal for 2008

October 15th, 2008

The cost of light rail and buses

October 15th, 2008
Joe Turner over at the TNT has a post about how Light rail isn't always cheaper to operate than buses. Most supporters claim that light rail, once built, is cheaper to operate than a traditional bus service. Turner draws from an explanation from John Niles, a local transportation consultant and a recent WPC Policy Brief, The Facts on Light Rail. In the study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the six existing light rail systems on the West Coast that have been operating for at least ten years. The cities ...

41st District is realigning - Seattle Times

October 15th, 2008
41st District is realigning Seattle Times, United States - 4 hours ago "By Sound Transit's own analysis, it won't relieve traffic congestion," he said. As far as his district in concerned, he said it's "not so much that it's ...

Light rail isn't always cheaper to operate than buses

October 14th, 2008
That's what John Niles, a transportation consultant, tells me in the e-mail below. Niles declares that he is a volunteer advisor to the campaign that is opposing Proposition 1, the $17.9 billion ballot measure for Sound Transit. I offer up Niles' observations and a couple of attachments for your perusal because I don't have time to go investigate how much Portland, Denver and all those other cities spend on their light rail vs. buses. Here are a couple pdf's that Niles sent. One is a spreadsheet, the other is the Washington Policy Center's take ...
Next Page »